Via Andrew Sullivan comes a link to a zealous young historian, who rightly acknowledges that referring to an ancient copy of a 18th-century Koran as ‘bookporn‘ might be a smidge inappropriate.
Describing the delicately-crafted gilt publication as ‘UNBEARABLY HOT’ might not go down too well with the fanatics, nor would the clearly sexual concept of the ‘torrential salivation’ it stimulates.
The Koran is not a one-handed read. Unless you’re Abu Hamza.

